William Shakespeare, a world-class English poet and playwright, has presented his Hamlet as a symbol of human conflict in a special literary focus and attitude of life, viewing the cryptogram of human distinction and divergence as the mirror image of problems. social. Hamlet is the name of a philosopher, who is tremendously favorite in the eyes of book lovers, the most important Shakespearean fans. It has duly stimulated the hearts of readers in view of its true beauty to develop the maxim of human tribulations and their prevailing solutions. William Shakespeare was the supreme author of all time. He was the only personality who had discovered the measure of human psychology in the first place and emphasized the amplified truth of beauty within the literary mindset. In Hamlet, he critically examined the philosophy of human conflict and tried to bring about a change between the resentment of men and women.

Shakespeare’s Hamlet has been accessible as a model personality display who had tried with all his heart to illuminate his feelings of curiosity about his father’s death. He was amazed to see the uncle’s behavior in his marriage to his mother. He was emotionally tormented with thoughts about his unusual departure from this short-lived world. He was informed about his father’s death, but was falsely implicated. Despite this darkness, he came to learn about his father’s murderers through his father’s ghostly spirit.

But he found himself restless in the state of meticulous suspicion about his father’s death. So he arranged to act a play “The murder of Gongago” where the facts and criticism of the drama will make the murderers predominate to understand their mental reactions for the commission of atrocious crimes in the eyes of a healthy society. Later, he was confirmed about his father’s culprits who left him devastated as invisible and unknown because of what had happened to him. He promised to take revenge on them: Claudio and his mother. His famous comments are widely vibrated towards the audience to a great extent. He spoke it to the depths of his heart as a cry of his feelings for survival on earth. “To be or not to be, that is the question”. He was dedicated within himself to die or live for revenge. He had been slow to take revenge in the sense that he suffered from indecision. He didn’t know what to do because he was discovering an opportunity to get revenge on the culprits. He was inclined to act crazy on stage, as his pretext caused others to keep him in the dark. Claudius thought that Hamlet had some clues to identify them in connection with the conspiracy against King Hamlet. He adopted the politics of soliloquy to understand the depth of revenge.

Because he had the mental strength to obtain enough energy to make up for the challenge of punishing his uncle and his mother. He wanted to reinforce mental afflictions with his unusual philosophy of life to find a conclusion that would identify the culprit of his inquisitive feelings. According to Hamlet, he would not kill Claudious in the state when he remains in supplication in the church in the sense that he would achieve a good harvest in the world from now on. He was discovering a way to kill him where he would get true peace and serenity from his life and he would be familiar with the fact that he was right in fulfilling his mission and his father would get peace in the due sense of perpetual happiness in the country. world onwards. In general, he was hesitant to get revenge on them. In this sense, TS Elliot, in his famous poem, ‘My J. Alfred Prufrock Love Song’, has brought contrast of similarities and comparison between Hamlet and Prufrock who, like Hamlet, had suffered from indecision. Prufrock was an indecisive man and like the modern man and modern dress; appears to be mentally and physically unable to perform his task. But, when faced with real life situations, it is completely different. He has no power to stand up to his own lady, but has been slow to take action against her like Prince Hamlet. Due to the fact, Hamlet, despite his mental alertness and capacity for revenge against the guilty, has been delayed in the sense that he knows the philosophy of life and social friction, which was based on courage and bravery. He does not like to act like a fickle breed of man who has no commitment against wrongdoing in social life. Prufrock has counted down the time like frogs, cats, and other mini-creatures to act for his beloved who persistently doesn’t like to be bullied, as he deems it tremendously suitable. That is why the poet Elliot says in Prufrock’s voice:

“My coat tomorrow, my neck rising firmly to my chin

My cheap and modest tie fastened with a simple pin “

William Shakespeare has described a truth of beauty in his famous book Hamlet. He has had an open mind in a realm of ideals of such a man who is never fickle and suffers from indecision to uproot the evils of society. Hamlet was a philosopher, poet and social reformer but despite such a quality that was hidden in him, he was not rigid in his conception to embed action against evils. It was not based on total courage and social reforms, as it used to be dedicated to finding the fault of the guilty. In short, he succeeded in making the actual facts, which he confirmed after many logical decisions and arguments. The queen and the others identified him as their swift enemy and tried to end his life. In Hamlet, William Shakespeare has accelerated the conspiracy visions and conflicts of human affliction in a significant way. The author has compiled materials from social settings where the relationships of men and women and the philosophy of reality and the realms of survival are coherent on earth by bringing a factual contrast to the sentiment of humanity. He kept some literary manifestation in the pages of his mind, which acted as mirrors of social unrest and the evils committed by them.

Shakespeare was only the personality who understood the modern philosophy of life and the culture that traditionally reflected social conflicts and contrasts in a spontaneous way. It introduced two tendencies of conflicts that were the tragedy and the game within the tragedy. Hamlet was a game of misfortunes and social conflicts, which were accepted by the social conditions of that time and the crisis reflected in his game to accelerate the basic strategy of life. If we judge the conflicts in Hamlet’s mind, we will find a form of human psychology that is tremendously extensive and critical in its due sense of social friction. Ophalia had a deep intimacy with Hamlet, but she had nothing to do for Hamlet. Because, according to her, Hamlet was not like a man of parts but like a man of cowardice so he began to create his own world of abandonment. All three characters in Shakespeare’s play are remarkable, but they are agile in the sense that they relied on complete hallucination and their own persuasions. These three characters are: Desdemona, Ophalia and Cordelia who had nothing to do something favorable and winning their beloved.

It is an analytical feeling for human beings if Hamlet had decided to die. It is your spontaneous conflicts of your mind critically because you had reactions and it was not credible on your part and you take bad marks from superiors. He arranged the play and observed the movements and attitude of his feelings towards the slaughter of his father. As for Hamlet’s madness, he was not mad, but he was inclined to pretend that he himself was mad. It happened in the sense that human beings are fickle in nature. He was on the path of committing evil and because of that, he may forget justice for self-devotion towards eternity.

In this regard, we find consistency of Hamlet’s protests with the following lines from the poem composed by Ella Wheeler Wilcox:

“Laugh and the world laughs with you,

Cry, and you will cry alone,

For the sad old land must borrow its joy

But it has enough problems of its own. “

In the last part of the story, we find all the extremes of both the plaintiff and the offender. Hamlet has finished off all extremes of his rivals and culprits. In his last message to Horace, his friend, he has asked him to tell the real event of retribution to the people of the world that Hamlet, after receiving unlimited disgust and mental afflictions, had finally taken revenge on the murderers of his people. dad. In short, we commemorate such a Hamlet in the sense that no one is above human conflict and the sanctuary of justice, being the king and queen, everyone must ultimately suffer for all misdeeds. In this context, HW Longfellow says: “Man is unjust, God is just and justice ultimately triumphs.”